- Concerns that testing labs will be a serious bottleneck and drag on the adult use industry
- A number of smaller operators are worried that the rules are too comprehensive and "onerous" and will drive the industry underground
- Concerns that the rules will limit out-of-state investment and make it difficult to work with experts and consultants from other states
- Questions about confidentiality provisions in the rules and the degree that applicant info will be publicly available
The Public Hearing on Proposed Adult Use Cannabis Rules Is Over, But the Public Comment Period Continues
Thursday, May 23, 2019
The public hearing on the proposed adult use cannabis rules took place this morning at the Holiday Inn in Portland. The room was packed with a pretty diverse group of industry folks – banks, towns, and marijuana establishments large and small were all well-represented today. Comments were limited to three minutes per person, and the hearing took barely more than two hours total. Some of the reoccurring issues throughout the morning included:
The panel of regulators from Department of Administrative and Financial Services (DAFS) and the Office of Marijuana Policy (OMP) seemed to be diligently taking notes this morning, and we’ll have to wait and see how amenable they are to changing the rules as a result of this process. It’s a safe bet that written comments (due June 2) will be more impactful than today’s three-minute spiels, but how impactful, we don’t know. The OMP says that they plan to provisionally adopt final rules and send those rules to the legislature for approval in June. If approved by the legislature, then the rules would likely be scheduled to take effect 90 days later.
Labels:
adult use marijuana,
adult use rules,
applications,
confidentiality provisions,
DAFS,
investors,
Maine Legislature,
OMP,
out of state investment,
public hearing,
testing labs
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment